GetSales vs ReactIn: the fleet or the signal
One is built to run many LinkedIn accounts as infrastructure. The other is built to catch people at the moment something happened.
| GetSales | ReactIn | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is best at | Many sender accounts, one shared inbox, API on every plan | Capturing signals and turning them into sequences |
| Unit | Per seat, from 39 dollars a month | Per sender, from 29 dollars a month |
| Follow-ups | Included | Only from the 69 dollar tier, the entry plan is first contact only |
| API and MCP | On every plan | Not the centre of the product |
| Agency setup | White-label from ten seats | Agency plan at 999 dollars for up to fifty senders |
| Enrichment included | 10 to 1,000 credits per seat depending on tier | 2,000 credits on both individual tiers |
GetSales treats LinkedIn outreach as infrastructure: a fleet of accounts, limits managed per account, one inbox where replies land, and an API on every plan so the CRM and the automations can read and write. If you run outreach for several clients, white-label from ten seats is the line that decides whether it works for you.
ReactIn starts from the opposite end. It listens for something happening, engagement, a webinar registration, a calendar event, then enriches the person and sequences them. Volumes are smaller and conversion is higher, which is the trade that defines signal-based prospecting.
The pricing comparison hides one thing worth checking: the ReactIn entry plan at 29 dollars covers first contact only, with no follow-ups. Since most replies come from follow-ups, the real entry point is the 69 dollar tier, and that is the number to put against a GetSales seat.
These are not exclusive, and the most effective setup we have seen runs both: a fleet working the list, and a signal layer interrupting it whenever someone does something worth reacting to within the week.